California Bankruptcy – State vs. Federal Law

California has developed a particular aspect as concerns Bankruptcy Law: although set forward by federal law, California bankruptcy courts have three specific items which are only applicable to California residents. Code of Civil Procedure amendments 704 and 703.140 establish a peculiar set of exemptions, one of which is known as ‘grubstake’ or ‘wildcard’ and refers to the preservation of certain assets under certain conditions. Another specific of California bankruptcy law refers to common property owned by a married couple which becomes state property even if only one spouse files for bankruptcy. The reverse positive Californian law entitles one spouse to a single discharge for assets procured after the bankruptcy order. These items and law developments are generally discussed during the Annual California Bankruptcy Conferences.

Accelerated Debt Consolidation For Unsecured Debts

Don’t allow yourself to get embroiled in any kind of financial crisis. To avoid such a disaster, take charge of your monthly payments and let it be a wholesome, single payment with reduced interest rates. This debt consolidation step would definitely assist you to stabilize your financial payments in a manageable way.

Another option to consider is accelerated debt consolidation could be the best solution for your debt dilemma. The plus point of accelerated debt consolidation is it takes charge of only those unsecured debts that are troubling you. So opt for it without any delay!

Study on Bankruptcy Recommends Reorganization As Priority

A new study by a bankruptcy expert on all types of bankruptcy including chapter 7 bankruptcy has brought forth disturbing findings. Professor Lynn LoPucki from the law school of the University of California, spearheaded the study that is titled “Bankruptcy Fire Sales.” Around 54 large companies that were in the bankruptcy process were covered.

The study revealed the popular trend followed by companies that turned bankrupt was to have competent managers who chose to sell them off at once. The study suggests that instead of pushing through such sales, it would be advisable for creditors and shareholders to double their recoveries by simply getting the company to reorganize rather than sell off.